Treasuries are continuing to price a significant "risk premium" with real yields heavily in the negative territory. To hold an instrument that locks one up for 10 years at -1% real yield (assuming inflation stays at current mild levels) makes little sense unless the instrument is used purely as protection against a crisis. Based on recent historical data the "Europe risk premium" is at least 200bp or higher.
 |
| Headline US CPI vs. 10-year treasury yield |
Even when considering the core CPI number, the risk premium (and negative real yield) is quite material. In the last couple of years 10-year treasury yields have been running at some 250bp above the core CPI. Now the yield is visibly below the core CPI number.
 |
| Core US CPI vs. 10-year treasury yield |
The absurdity of this disconnect can be seen by comparing the US to Japan. Japanese10-year real yield is actually positive - over 100bp (90bp nominal yield, with -20bp CPI). A holder of 10-year JGBs makes some 200bp more than a holder of US treasuries in real terms. Such discrepancy is clearly unsustainable in the long term.
 |
| US vs Japan 10-year yields (source: Capital Economics) |
SoberLook.com